Santos Bravos Miss Out, Karol G Sparks Debate as Latin Grammys Echo BTS' Category Concerns
The 2026 Latin Grammy nominations have brought an uncomfortable question into focus: why should an artist's nationality determine where their music belongs when music itself increasingly moves across borders?
The September 16th nominations highlighted that tension from several directions. From one side, Colombian superstar Karol G was recognized for a song rooted in Mexican music, showing that genre does not have to be confined by nationality. Prince Royce on the other hand, criticized the lack of bachata in a category carrying the genre's name and rising Latin boy group SANTOS BRAVOS, whose multinational members were trained through a K-POP-style system, was also absent from Best New Artist despite previously emerging as a potential contender.
None of these cases alone proves bias or a fundamental problem with the awards. However, when put together, they raise a broader question about how institutions define musical identity when an artist's nationality, sound and production system no longer come from the same place. Representation should not mean assigning artists to categories based on their passports, but recognizing the music they make without turning geography into a boundary.
Karol G became an immediate focus of debate after "Ese Hombre Es Malo" was nominated for Best Regional Mexican Song. While some questioned the Colombian singer's inclusion in a category so closely associated with Mexican musical tradition, the nomination itself suggests the Latin Grammys have begun looking beyond nationality and recognized the song based just on its musical identity.
The academy demonstrated that Karol G's nationality does not prevent her from making regional Mexican music. Despite the debate, her nomination reflects an increasingly borderless industry in which genre is not necessarily determined by where an artist comes from.
That makes Prince Royce's criticism of this year's nominations even more difficult to ignore.
The Dominican-American singer questioned why the Best Merengue/Bachata Album category did not contain a single full bachata album, estimating that only around 15% of the music represented across the nominees was actually bachata.
"Being Dominican is a nationality. Bachata is a genre, a culture and a history with an identity of its own," Royce wrote on Instagram. His collaborative album with Romeo Santos, "Better Late Than Never," was released within the eligibility period and reached No. 1 on Billboard's Tropical Albums chart and No. 2 on Top Latin Albums. Neither artist received a nomination.
Royce acknowledged that awards are subjective and commercial success does not guarantee recognition. His criticism instead targeted the institution itself, questioning how an award can carry bachata in its name while largely failing to recognize albums centered on the genre. He also warned that awards risk becoming popularity contests shaped by campaigns, relationships and industry connections.
Then there is SANTOS BRAVOS, who were missing from the 11 Best New Artist nominees despite being discussed as potential contenders and participating in a Latin Recording Academy Best New Artist showcase in Los Angeles earlier this year.
Calling the omission definitive proof of a "snub" would go too far. There is no evidence voters excluded Santos Bravos because of the group's unusual background. Yet that background is precisely what makes their absence interesting within the wider debate.
Santos Bravos is unmistakably a Latin group. Its members represent Mexico, Puerto Rico, Peru, Brazil and the Mexican-American community, while the group operates primarily within the Latin music market with Latin identity at the center of its music.
What makes Santos Bravos unusual is the system behind them. Created by HYBE Latin America, the members underwent K-POP-style vocal, dance and performance training, including work with longtime BTS performance director Son Sung-deuk.
There is no evidence that their HYBE or K-POP connection caused the omission. However, their rise raises a broader question: when an artist's identity, music and production system cross different cultures, what ultimately determines where they belong?
K-POP has already confronted a version of that question. BTS spent years breaking through barriers that had kept Korean-language pop largely outside the center of the Western music industry.
Yet after BTS had proven Asian music could compete in the global mainstream, the Recording Academy introduced Best Asian Pop Music Performance for the 2027 Grammys. BTS declined to submit, saying they wanted their music recognized beyond divisions of region or language.
The Academy argued the category expanded representation without excluding Asian artists from general awards. But BTS' response exposed the contradiction: what happens when artists break out of a regional box, only for an awards system to create a new one around them?
The Latin Grammys now face a similar contradiction. If Karol G can cross nationality to be recognized for Mexican music, why is bachata barely represented in a category carrying its name? And if musical identity matters more than where an artist comes from, SANTOS BRAVOS should be no less Latin because their production system originated in Korea.
There is no evidence their K-POP connection explains the Best New Artist omission. However, Santos Bravos exposes how quickly traditional award categories are being challenged by an increasingly global industry.
BTS helped accelerate that change. Their breakthrough proved Korean artists could move beyond the "Asian" market, while the system behind their success has since expanded beyond Korea itself. Santos Bravos represents that next step: a Latin group built through a model once considered distinctly K-POP.
The music industry has already begun moving beyond the borders that once defined it. If the Recording Academy wants to represent where music is going rather than simply where it has been, the institution will increasingly have to confront whether its categories, and the choices made within them, are keeping up.
Comments (0)
Loading comments…